Australian Workers' Union, The v WesTrac Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 2261


[2024] FWC 2261

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Australian Workers’ Union, The
v

WesTrac Pty Ltd

(B2024/1057)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN

CANBERRA, 23 AUGUST 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of WesTrack Pty Ltd.

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of WesTrac Pty Ltd (WesTrac or Employer).

  1. The Respondent initially advised the Commission that it opposed the application. Following a conference conducted on 22 August 2024, the parties reached a consent position which is reflected in draft orders provided to the Commission by the parties.  

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of John Boyd, Senior Vice President, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with WesTrac, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 September 2024. This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR778578.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778577>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union, The v WesTrac Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2261
Case
[2024] FWC 2261
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) sought an order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to conduct a protected action ballot of certain employees of WesTrac Pty Ltd. The application was lodged with the Fair Work Commission (FWC), which is responsible for handling disputes under the Act. Initially, WesTrac opposed the application; however, following a conference on 22 August 2024, the parties reached a consent position. The Deputy President, Dean, determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the court involved whether the AWU had met the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act to conduct a protected action ballot. This includes verifying that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with WesTrac and establishing the notification time for the proposed agreement. The AWU's declaration, provided by John Boyd, Senior Vice President, outlined the steps taken during the bargaining process and affirmed the union's genuine efforts. Additionally, the court needed to confirm the authority of Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) as an eligible ballot agent under section 468A of the Act.

The Deputy President, Dean, found that the AWU had satisfied all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act, given the evidence presented. The court also determined that the voting period for the ballot would close on 12 September 2024, setting the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act. An order was issued in PR778578, and the matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A. The court issued directions for the parties to attend the conference prepared for meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.