| [2024] FWC 1056 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union, The
v
Tully Sugar Limited T/A Tully Sugar
(B2024/464)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 23 APRIL 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Tully Sugar Limited T/A Tully Sugar
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Tully Sugar Limited T/A Tully Sugar (Tully Sugar or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)[1] and “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[2] have made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 22 April 2024, the Commission was advised that Tully Sugar did not, in effect, object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Richard Billingham, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[3] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 9 May 2024.[4] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR773837.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related members. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/463.
[2] B2024/467.
[3] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.
[4] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date effect of the Order, as sought in the Application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR773840>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union, The v Tully Sugar Limited T/A Tully Sugar [2024] FWC 1056
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1056
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC considered the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with Tully Sugar and the declaration of Mr Richard Billingham, the AWU Organiser, who attested to the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement. The FWC concluded that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met and that a notification time for the proposed agreement existed. The ballot for the protected action was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS), an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act. The FWC determined that voting would close on 9 May 2024, establishing the ballot period for section 448A(2) of the Act.
The FWC issued an order for the protected action ballot and scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another member of the Commission. This conference aimed to facilitate meaningful negotiations among all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement. The FWC also indicated that directions would be issued to ensure the parties' attendance and readiness for the conference.
The FWC did not specify final orders in this decision but indicated that the matter would be handled by another member of the Commission to conduct the conciliation conference and issue necessary directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.