| [2023] FWC 2414 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union, The
v
The Smith’s Snackfood Company Pty Ltd T/A The Smith’s Snackfood Company
(B2023/1000)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 19 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Smith’s Snackfood Company Pty Ltd T/A The Smith’s Snackfood Company
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of The Smith’s Snackfood Company Pty Ltd (Smith’s Snackfood or Employer).
On 19 September 2023, the Commission was advised that Smith’s Snackfood, in effect did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Terry McQuilan, Organiser for the AWU, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Smith’s Snackfood, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 4 October 2023.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR766373.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400
[2] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date of effect of the Order and reflects the intended operation of the proposed order.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< PR766372>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union, The v The Smith's Snackfood Company Pty Ltd T/A the Smith's Snackfood Company [2023] FWC 2414
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2414
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the Commission to decide was whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act had been met for the AWU to conduct a protected action ballot. These requirements included demonstrating that the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer and that a notification period for the proposed agreement had been established. Additionally, the Commission had to determine the appropriate closing date for the ballot, which was to be set within the framework of section 443(3)(c) of the Act.
The Deputy President Hampton found that the AWU had fulfilled all the necessary requirements to conduct a protected action ballot. The declaration from Mr Terry McQuilan, the Organiser for the AWU, along with other evidence presented, confirmed that the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement and that a notification period had been established. The Deputy President also set the closing date for the ballot as 4 October 2023, which was determined to be ten working days from the date of the order's effect. Furthermore, the Commission determined that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS, the appointed ballot agent, was duly authorised to conduct the ballot.
In light of the determination, the Commission issued an order granting the AWU's application for a protected action ballot. The matter was then assigned to another Member of the Commission to oversee a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act. This conference aimed to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.