Australian Workers' Union, The v Santos WA Energy Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 2097


[2022] FWC 2097

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

Australian Workers’ Union, The
v

Santos WA Energy Ltd

(B2022/1169)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN

CANBERRA, 8 AUGUST 2022

Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2022/1169

  1. On 3 August 2022, The Australian Workers’ Union (Union) made an application to the Fair Work Commission pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR742876, made on 21 June 2022. The Order applies to certain employees of Santos WA Energy Ltd (the Respondent).

  1. The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 4 July 2022. Pursuant to s. 459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expired at midnight on 2 August 2022.

  1. The Respondent opposed the Union’s application to extend the 30 day period for protected action. A hearing was held on 8 August 2022. Mr Z Duncalfe, National Legal Officer, appeared for the Union and Mr G Giorgi, lawyer, was given permission to appear for the Respondent.

  1. Mr N Vitanza gave evidence on behalf of the Respondent and both parties made extensive submissions.

  1. Essentially, the Respondent contended that the Commission should not exercise its discretion to extend the 30 day period due to:

a.The delay by the Union in filing this application;

b.The Union’s non-compliance with good faith bargaining obligations;

c.A loss of willingness among the majority of employees to take protected industrial action; and

d.A threat to take unprotected industrial action.

  1. At the conclusion of the evidence and submissions, the parties agreed to take part in a private conference prior to the end of the hearing. The outcome of the conference was that the Respondent agreed to withdraw its objection to the application on the basis that the Union would immediately cease the personal attacks (described by the Respondent as “disrespectful, defamatory and gendered statements”) it had made publicly via a Facebook page in relation to Ms A Trethewey, and no protected action would commence prior to 10 August 2022.

  1. Mr Duncalfe confirmed on record that he was authorised to provide an undertaking to this effect on behalf of the Union, and subsequently did so orally.

  1. Otherwise, in addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the Union who is the Applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.

  1. Based on the above and the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act have been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expired at midnight on 2 August 2022, the extension period will operate from 2 August 2022.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR744593.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

Z Duncalfe for the Applicant.
G Giorgi for the Respondent.

Hearing details:

2022.

Perth and Canberra (by telephone): 
August 8

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR744591>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union, The v Santos WA Energy Ltd [2022] FWC 2097
Case
[2022] FWC 2097
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, the Australian Workers' Union applied to the Fair Work Commission for an extension of the 30-day period for protected action authorised by a ballot order. The application was opposed by Santos WA Energy Ltd, who argued against the extension based on the Union's delay in filing the application, non-compliance with good faith bargaining obligations, a perceived loss of willingness among employees to take action, and a threat of unprotected industrial action. The hearing took place on August 8, 2022, and both parties presented evidence and submissions. Ultimately, the parties agreed to a private conference, after which Santos withdrew its opposition on the condition that the Union cease certain public statements and not commence any protected action before August 10, 2022.

The legal issues before the Fair Work Commission centred on the interpretation and application of s.459 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) in relation to extending the 30-day period for protected action. The Union sought an extension of the period, which had expired on August 2, 2022. Santos opposed the application on several grounds, including the Union's delay in filing the application and its failure to comply with good faith bargaining obligations. The Commission had to weigh these arguments against the statutory provisions and determine whether an extension was appropriate.

The Fair Work Commission, after considering the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, concluded that the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act had been met. The Deputy President was satisfied that an extension was appropriate, given the circumstances and the agreement reached during the private conference. The 30-day extension would commence from August 2, 2022. The Commission took into account the Union's undertaking to cease certain public statements and the agreement that no protected action would commence before August 10, 2022.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order extending the 30-day period for protected action from August 2, 2022. This extension was contingent on the Union's compliance with the conditions agreed upon during the private conference, including ceasing certain public statements and not commencing any protected action before August 10, 2022. The order reflects the Commission's determination that the application met the requirements of s.459 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and that an extension was warranted under the circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.