Australian Trade Commission (Austrade)

Case [2016] FWCA 101


[2016] FWCA 101
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Australian Trade Commission (Austrade)
(AG2015/7112)

AUSTRADE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2018

Commonwealth employment

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 7 JANUARY 2016

Application for approval of the Austrade Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Austrade Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Australian Trade Commission (Austrade). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 January 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 January 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE417363  PR575874>

Details
AGLC
Australian Trade Commission (Austrade) [2016] FWCA 101
Case
[2016] FWCA 101
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Trade Commission, known as Austrade, applied for approval of the Enterprise Agreement for the years 2015-2018. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission, which had the authority to assess the agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary concern of the application was to ensure that the proposed terms and conditions of employment within Austrade were fair and met the legal standards for enterprise agreements.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the Enterprise Agreement met the criteria set forth in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was "better off overall" for employees, if it contained provisions that were necessary to prevent, reduce or eliminate workplace bullying, and if it complied with all other statutory requirements. This involved scrutinising the proposed terms related to wages, working conditions, dispute resolution mechanisms, and other employment-related aspects to ensure they were fair and reasonable.

The Commission, after reviewing the application and hearing submissions from both Austrade and employee representatives, concluded that the Enterprise Agreement met the necessary criteria. The agreement was deemed to be fair, as it provided employees with benefits that were at least as good as, or better than, their previous conditions or the applicable awards. Furthermore, the agreement included provisions to address workplace bullying and met all other statutory requirements. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, recognising its compliance with the relevant legislative standards.

The Fair Work Commission's decision was to approve the Austrade Enterprise Agreement for the years 2015-2018, confirming its fairness and compliance with the Fair Work Act. This approval allows the agreement to be implemented, providing a legally binding framework for the employment terms and conditions within Austrade for the specified period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.