| [2014] FWCA 5345 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Australian Specialty Foods Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8474)
AUSTRALIAN SPECIALTY FOODS PTY LTD AND THE AUSTRALASIAN MEAT INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES' UNION VICTORIAN MEAT PROCESSING AGREEMENT 2014
Meat Industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEWIN | MELBOURNE, 15 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Australian Specialty Foods Pty Ltd and the Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union Victorian Meat Processing Agreement 2014 - correction to decision
[1] The decision issued by the Fair Work Commission on 6 August 2014 [[2014] FWCA 5345] is corrected as follows:
By deleting the date “30 July 2018” where it appears in paragraph [6] of the decision and replacing it with the date “30 June 2018”.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE409484 PR554363>
- AGLC
- Australian Specialty Foods Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5345
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5345
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed single-enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and if it was free from any discriminatory provisions. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement was consistent with the principles of the national workplace relations system, including the protection of vulnerable employees and the promotion of fair bargaining practices.
The Commission carefully reviewed the provisions of the proposed agreement and considered submissions from both the employer and the union. It found that the agreement, while generally fair and reasonable, contained certain provisions that did not align with the statutory requirements. The Commission identified issues related to the calculation of penalty rates and the treatment of shift differentials. After making some adjustments to the agreement, the Commission concluded that it met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that all employees, particularly those in vulnerable positions, were adequately protected under the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the single-enterprise agreement with modifications.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.