Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vis, Haarsma and Goodger No. Scgrg-99-1478
Case
•
[2000] SASC 258
•29 August 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vis, Haarsma and Goodger No. Scgrg-99-1478 [2000] SASC 258
[2000] SASC 258
29 August 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) filed a complaint against four individuals under the Corporations Law, alleging various offences related to the management of a corporation. Mr. Vis pleaded guilty, while the other defendants did not admit the complaint's truth. The magistrate dismissed the complaint against the other defendants, leading ASIC to appeal the decision. The appeal focused on the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal and ASIC's power to institute it. The court found that while ASIC had the power to appeal, the appeal was incompetent as the court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the dismissal of a summary offence charge. The court concluded that the legislative scheme did not confer jurisdiction to entertain such appeals, despite the common practice in some jurisdictions. The appeal was dismissed due to the court's lack of jurisdiction.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
May v Commonwealth [2024] ACTCA 6
Cases Citing This Decision
30
May v Commonwealth
[2024] ACTCA 6
Bevan Paul Moroney v George John Wojcicka
[2003] ACTCA 15
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
0
Byrnes v The Queen
[1999] HCA 38
Bond v The Queen
[2000] HCA 13
R v Hughes
[2000] HCA 22