Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vis, Haarsma and Goodger No. Scgrg-99-1478

Case

[2000] SASC 258

29 August 2000


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vis, Haarsma and Goodger No. Scgrg-99-1478 [2000] SASC 258 [2000] SASC 258 29 August 2000

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) filed a complaint against four individuals under the Corporations Law, alleging various offences related to the management of a corporation. Mr. Vis pleaded guilty, while the other defendants did not admit the complaint's truth. The magistrate dismissed the complaint against the other defendants, leading ASIC to appeal the decision. The appeal focused on the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal and ASIC's power to institute it. The court found that while ASIC had the power to appeal, the appeal was incompetent as the court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the dismissal of a summary offence charge. The court concluded that the legislative scheme did not confer jurisdiction to entertain such appeals, despite the common practice in some jurisdictions. The appeal was dismissed due to the court's lack of jurisdiction.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Jurisdiction

  • Breach of Contract

  • Unconscionable Conduct

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
May v Commonwealth [2024] ACTCA 6

Cases Citing This Decision

30

May v Commonwealth [2024] ACTCA 6
Cases Cited

18

Statutory Material Cited

0

Byrnes v The Queen [1999] HCA 38
Bond v The Queen [2000] HCA 13
R v Hughes [2000] HCA 22