Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Financial Circle Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] FCA 1644
•2 November 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Financial Circle Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1644
[2018] FCA 1644
2 November 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Federal Court of Australia, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) sought court approval for declarations, injunctions, and costs against Financial Circle Pty Ltd. ASIC alleged that Financial Circle contravened numerous provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), and the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth). The court needed to determine whether Financial Circle had contravened these statutory provisions and, if so, what penalties and relief should be imposed. Financial Circle operated a scheme that purported to allow "borrowers" to access small amounts of money. However, ASIC alleged that the company earned money by transferring "borrowers" to a retail superannuation fund and advising them to obtain insurance, thereby collecting commissions and fees in excess of the "loan" amount. ASIC and Financial Circle had reached an agreement on liability for contravention of the statutory provisions and penalties.
The court found that Financial Circle had contravened the statutory provisions, including the misleading or deceptive conduct provisions and the best interests obligations under the Corporations Act. The court also found that Financial Circle had engaged in unconscionable conduct and had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its authorised representatives complied with the statutory provisions. The court approved the declarations, injunctions, and costs sought by ASIC, and ordered Financial Circle to pay civil penalties and costs. The court also made orders for confidentiality and redaction of certain documents. The court's decision aimed to protect the public and deter future contraventions of the statutory provisions.
The court found that Financial Circle had contravened the statutory provisions, including the misleading or deceptive conduct provisions and the best interests obligations under the Corporations Act. The court also found that Financial Circle had engaged in unconscionable conduct and had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its authorised representatives complied with the statutory provisions. The court approved the declarations, injunctions, and costs sought by ASIC, and ordered Financial Circle to pay civil penalties and costs. The court also made orders for confidentiality and redaction of certain documents. The court's decision aimed to protect the public and deter future contraventions of the statutory provisions.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Consumer Law
-
Financial Services Law
Legal Concepts
-
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Unlicensed Credit Activity
-
Regulatory Compliance
-
Civil Penalty
-
Injunction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Financial Circle Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1644
Most Recent Citation
R and N Hunter Pty Ltd ATF the Hunter Family Superannuation Fund v Count Financial Limited [2025] FCA 544
Cases Citing This Decision
56
Wynd and Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2020] AATA 3387
Re Hres and Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2008] AATA 707
Cases Cited
43
Statutory Material Cited
4
Phelps v Western Mining Corporation Ltd
[1978] FCA 50
Phelps v Western Mining Corporation Ltd
[1978] FCA 50
Cited Sections