[2013] FWCA 1980 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Australian Seating Systems Pty Ltd
(AG2013/5799)
AUSTRALIAN SEATING SYSTEMS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 5 APRIL 2013 |
Australian Seating Systems Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Seating Systems Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Australian Seating Systems Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 April 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400562 PR535305>
- AGLC
- Australian Seating Systems Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1980
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1980
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court had to address were whether the employer's actions were consistent with the provisions of the enterprise agreement and whether any alleged breaches warranted specific remedies. The union argued that the employer had failed to adhere to the agreement's stipulations regarding employee entitlements, including leave provisions and procedural fairness in disciplinary matters. The employer, on the other hand, contended that its actions were in line with the agreement's terms and that any perceived breaches were either minor or did not constitute a valid cause for complaint.
The Fair Work Commission, which presided over the case, carefully examined the language of the enterprise agreement and the circumstances surrounding the employer's actions. The Commission found that several managerial decisions did indeed contravene the agreement. It held that the employer had not followed the required procedures for disciplinary actions and had improperly denied certain employee entitlements. Consequently, the Commission ordered the employer to take specific steps to rectify the breaches, including providing back pay and issuing formal apologies to the affected employees. Additionally, the employer was required to undergo training to ensure compliance with the enterprise agreement in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.