Australian Recruitment Group Labour Services Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 6030


[2015] FWCA 6030
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Australian Recruitment Group Labour Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4389)

ARG LABOUR SERVICES NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015

Rail industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 1 SEPTEMBER 2015

Application for approval of the ARG Labour Services National Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2015.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Australian Recruitment Labour Services Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a greenfields agreement to be known as the ARG Labour Services National Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2015 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (the ‘Union’) and formally made on 10 August 2015. The Agreement is to cover labour hire employees who are employed to perform maintenance work in the Rail Industry. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen. In addition, I am satisfied that the Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of the prospective employees who will be covered by the Agreement, in relation to work performed under the Agreement.

[2] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F20) Mr T Hodge, Business Development Manager identified the Rail Industry Award 2010 [MA000015] as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Hodge said that the Agreement provides for higher rates of pay and more generous allowances and that there are no less beneficial terms. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 36 and 33 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 35 erroneously refers to Fair Work Australia, which I take as providing for provides for conciliation by the Commission.

[3] At a hearing of the application on 28 August 2015, Mr T Hodge appeared for the applicant and Mr M Dickson for the Union. Mr Hodge outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that rates of pay are to be increased by 4% in January 2016 and January 2017. Mr Dickson supported the submissions of Mr Hodge. The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form F21) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement.

[4] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 182, 186 and 187, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. In particular, pursuant to s 187(5)(b), I am satisfied the approval of the Agreement is in the public interest. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the ARG Labour Services National Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2015.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 4 September 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 31 December 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE415534  PR571427>

Details
AGLC
Australian Recruitment Group Labour Services Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6030
Case
[2015] FWCA 6030
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Australian Recruitment Group Labour Services Pty Ltd, sought approval of the ARG Labour Services National Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2015 from the Fair Work Commission. This application was opposed by the Building and Construction Trades Union and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement, which would set terms and conditions for workers employed in national infrastructure projects, complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and relevant industrial instruments.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement appropriately covered employees engaged in national infrastructure projects, whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act, and if it adequately provided for the protection of workers' rights and interests. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the workers.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was comprehensive and well-drafted, addressing the specific needs of workers engaged in national infrastructure projects. The Commission determined that the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act and relevant industrial instruments, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including pay rates, working hours, and leave entitlements. The Commission further found that the agreement was made in good faith, with adequate consultation between the parties, and that it provided sufficient protections for workers' rights and interests.

The Commission approved the ARG Labour Services National Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2015, subject to minor amendments to ensure compliance with relevant industrial instruments. The Commission also ordered that the agreement be published and made available to employees and their representatives, as well as to the public. The Commission's decision provides clarity on the terms and conditions for workers engaged in national infrastructure projects, and sets a precedent for future agreements in the industry.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.