Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 3021


[2025] FWC 3021

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union
v

Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd

(B2025/1565)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 9 OCTOBER 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd – non-AEC ballot electronic voting

  1. This is an application by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd (Pacific National or Employer).

  1. I note that the Australian Federated Union of Locomotive Employees (AFULE)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 9 October 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stefanie Whyte, President, setting out the steps taken by the ARTBU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Pacific National, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 23 October 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of five (5) calendar days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order. Due to the operation of s.414(2)(a) of the Act, the Applicant must provide at least 3 working days’ notice of industrial action in the event the notice period elapses over a recognised public holiday.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR792517. 

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1568.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR792518>

Details
AGLC
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 3021
Case
[2025] FWC 3021
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd concerns an application made by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Pacific National (Queensland Coal) Pty Ltd (Pacific National). The RTBU sought to conduct a ballot for potential industrial action regarding a proposed enterprise agreement. Pacific National did not object to the application, and the Australian Federated Union of Locomotive Employees had also filed a separate application for a ballot on the same proposed agreement.

The key legal issues for the Fair Work Commission to decide were whether the RTBU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Pacific National and whether the conditions for a protected action ballot were met. The Commission had to determine if the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate and if all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. Furthermore, the Commission needed to establish if there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for the industrial action, as required by section 443(5) of the Act.

The Deputy President, Wright, concluded that the RTBU had genuinely attempted to negotiate with Pacific National and that all necessary requirements for the protected action ballot were fulfilled. The Commission authorised Fair Vote Services, an approved protected action ballot agent, to conduct the ballot. The Deputy President also determined that the closing date for voting would be 23 October 2025, allowing for an extended period of written notice for the industrial action due to exceptional circumstances. This decision was based on the declaration by Stefanie Whyte, President of the RTBU, detailing the bargaining process and the union's efforts to reach an agreement. The matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, with another Member of the Commission overseeing the negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.