Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2647


[2025] FWC 2647

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union
v

Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd

(B2025/1402)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 8 SEPTEMBER 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (ARTBIU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order (PABO) in relation to certain employees of Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd (Aurizon or Employer).

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.[1]

  1. On 5 September 2025, the Employer advised that it did not object to the application subject to confirmation of there being an extended notice period of five (5) working days in relation to seven of the proposed forms of industrial action. The ARTBIU in effect, accepted that there were the relevant exceptional circumstances and agreed to that amendment.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Darren Phillips, Branch Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the ARTBIU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Aurizon, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by True Vote Pty Ltd (True Vote). True Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 19 September 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. Pursuant to s.443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the nominated ballot questions (1, 5, 9, 17, 18, 19 and 20) in clause 5 of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR791504. 

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1393 and B2025/1399.

[2] This was the specific date sought in the application and is consistent with the related matters.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR791506>

Details
AGLC
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2647
Case
[2025] FWC 2647
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (ARTBIU) filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order (PABO) concerning certain employees of Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd. The application pertains to a proposed enterprise agreement and seeks authorisation for a ballot to be conducted by True Vote Pty Ltd, which is recognised as an eligible protected action ballot agent. The ARTBIU has stated that it has been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with Aurizon, and the employer did not object to the application, subject to an extension of the notice period to five working days for specific forms of industrial action. Additionally, two other unions, the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, have made separate applications for a PABO concerning the same proposed enterprise agreement.

The legal issues in this case primarily revolve around whether the requirements for a PABO under section 443 of the Fair Work Act have been met, including the demonstration of exceptional circumstances that justify an extended notice period. The Deputy President had to determine whether the notification period was appropriate and if the ARTBIU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Aurizon. Additionally, the court had to decide on the appropriateness of the ballot period and the authorisation of True Vote Pty Ltd as the ballot agent.

The Deputy President concluded that the ARTBIU had met all the requirements for a PABO as outlined in section 443 of the Fair Work Act. The evidence, including the declaration by the Branch Secretary, supported the assertion that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Aurizon. The court was satisfied that exceptional circumstances justified the extension of the notice period to five working days for certain forms of industrial action. The Deputy President also confirmed the date for the closure of voting as 19 September 2025, which aligned with the related matters. The court determined that the ballot would be conducted by True Vote Pty Ltd, as it was authorised as a ballot agent.

In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission issued an Order granting the application for a PABO, with specific conditions regarding the notice period and the authorised ballot agent. The ballot period was set to close on 19 September 2025. This matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, ensuring that all bargaining representatives participated in meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.