| [2019] FWCA 7809 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union
(AG2019/4171)
VICTORIAN LOCOMOTIVE DIVISION OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT-2019-2023
Rail industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 15 NOVEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Victorian Locomotive Division Office Administrative Staff Enterprise Agreement-2019-2023.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Victorian Locomotive Division Office Administrative Staff Enterprise Agreement-2019-2023. (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I note that the employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application for approval of an enterprise agreement (F17) indicates that employees were notified of the details of the vote at a meeting held on 7 October 2019. I note that the vote commenced less than seven clear days later, on 14 October 2019. Also relevant is the fact that the F17 states that all employees that will be covered by the Agreement cast a valid vote to approve the Agreement. In Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and Ors v CBI Constructors Pty Ltd, 1 the Full Bench confirmed that an employer must take all reasonable steps to notify relevant employees of the time, place and method of the vote at least seven clear days before the commencement of the vote, pursuant to s.180 (3) of the Act. Although it does not appear that employees were notified of the time, place and method of the vote seven clear days before the commencement of the vote, I refer to s.188 (2) of the Act and am satisfied that this error constitutes a minor procedural error, and that employees covered by this Agreement are not likely to be disadvantaged as a result of the error.2
[3] I note that the Notice of employee representational rights (Notice) provided to the employees is an earlier version of the Notice which has since been superseded. As the Notice provided to employees contains content that is not prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009, it therefore contravenes s.174 (1A) of the Act. However, I refer to s.188 (2) of the Act and am satisfied that this error constitutes a minor technical error, and that employees covered by this Agreement are not likely to be disadvantaged as a result of the error. 3
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 12 – Annual Leave
• Clause 13 – Personal Leave
However, noting clause 4 (b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 November 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
COMMISSIONER
2 Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others [2019] FWCFB 318.
3 Ibid.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506104 PR714312>
- AGLC
- Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union [2019] FWCA 7809
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 7809
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes, whether the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees, and whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative requirements. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes and whether it adequately protected the rights of employees.
The Commission found that the agreement met the necessary standards and criteria for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes and adequately protected the rights of employees. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the relevant legislative requirements.
The Commission approved the Victorian Locomotive Division Office Administrative Staff Enterprise Agreement from 2019 to 2023. The agreement provides for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes, adequately protects the rights of employees, and complies with the relevant legislative requirements. The approval of the agreement is significant for the employees and employers involved in the Victorian Locomotive Division Office Administrative Staff industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.