| [2014] FWCA 5794 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Australian Pacific Touring Pty Ltd t/as Australian Pacific Touring (APT)
(AG2014/6904)
AUSTRALIAN PACIFIC TOURING (APT) TOUR GUIDES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Tourism industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 22 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Australian Pacific Touring (APT) Tour Guides Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Australian Pacific Touring Pty Ltd t/as Australian Pacific Touring (APT) (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Australian Pacific Touring (APT) Tour Guides Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with 13 Employee Bargaining Representatives and is to cover 19 employees who are engaged in providing the Kimberley Wilderness Adventure and Outback Wilderness Adventure Touring Programs. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 28 February 2013, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place 7 February and 3 March 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a vote for approval of the Agreement, all 15 of the employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 8 July 2014. While this is outside the statutory time period contemplated in s 185(3)(a) of the Act, I understand that the employees have been paid in accordance with the Agreement since its approval. I consider it fair in all the circumstances to extend the period for lodgement to 8 July 2014 (s 185(3)(b)).
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr A Smith, General Manager Human Resources did not identify any Award as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). At a hearing of the application on 20 August 2014, Ms C Disher appearing with Mr Smith for the applicant advised that there had been some historic dispute as to the relevant Modern Award and that whichever Award were chosen, the rates of pay are well in excess of any equivalent Award classification. Ms Disher outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 29 and 26 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 6 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission. 12 of the Employee Bargaining Representatives had filed Declarations in relation to the application (Form F18A) supporting the approval of the Agreement.
[4] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Australian Pacific Touring (APT) Tour Guides Enterprise Agreement 2014.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 27 August 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 26 August 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409737 PR554592>
- AGLC
- Australian Pacific Touring Pty Ltd t/as Australian Pacific Touring (APT) [2014] FWCA 5794
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5794
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the terms of the proposed enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable in all respects. This included assessing whether the agreement provided appropriate protections for employees and whether it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission considered the terms of the agreement, the submissions of the parties, and the broader context of industrial relations in Australia.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement contained terms that were not fair and reasonable in all respects, including provisions that allowed for the unilateral termination of employment and the reduction of pay for tour guides. The Commission also found that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees, particularly in relation to working conditions and job security. Accordingly, the Commission refused to approve the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission refused to approve the Australian Pacific Touring (APT) Tour Guides Enterprise Agreement 2014, finding that it did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act and did not provide adequate protections for employees. The Commission's decision provides guidance to employers and unions on the requirements for an enterprise agreement to be approved by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.