Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch

Case [2022] FWC 126


[2022] FWC 126

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch

(RE2021/1238)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Sally Anne Higgs – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Ms Sally Anne Higgs. The Commission subsequently issued Ms Higgs a right of entry permit which will expire on 15 December 2024.

  1. Ms Higgs’ permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Ms Higgs to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Ms Higgs, I need to be satisfied that she is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application the ANMF filed declarations by Ms Higgs and Ms Lisa Fitzpatrick, Secretary (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Ms Higgs has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 2 September 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1] 

·   Ms Higgs has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Ms Higgs has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Ms Higgs nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by her (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Ms Higgs has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Ms Higgs has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Ms Higgs held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Ms Higgs has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Ms Higgs is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Ms Higgs is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Ms Higgs by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Ms Higgs is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Ms Higgs separately.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 10 November 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 2 September 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737714>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch [2022] FWC 126
Case
[2022] FWC 126
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch applied for a right of entry permit for one of its officials, Ms Sally Anne Higgs, under section 512 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission. The permit had previously been issued but was not received by Ms Higgs and was listed among 37 missing entry permits. The Commission decided to revoke the missing permit and issue a new one to Ms Higgs.

The legal issue before the Deputy President was whether Ms Higgs was a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit under the Act. This required consideration of the relevant statutory considerations, including Ms Higgs' training, criminal record, and any previous orders or penalties related to industrial laws. The Deputy President had to determine if Ms Higgs met the qualification criteria set out in section 513 of the Act.

The Deputy President considered the declarations filed by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and found that Ms Higgs met all the permit qualification matters. The declarations confirmed that Ms Higgs had received appropriate training, had no criminal convictions related to industrial laws, and had no penalties or orders imposed under the Act or any other industrial law. The Deputy President accepted that Ms Higgs was a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit and revoked the missing permit, issuing a new one to Ms Higgs.

The Deputy President revoked the previously issued permit with effect from the date of the decision and issued a separate revocation order. The Deputy President also found that Ms Higgs met the qualification criteria and was satisfied that she was a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit. A new permit was to be issued to Ms Higgs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.