Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 895


[2025] FWC 895

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation
v

Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd

(B2025/521)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 31 MARCH 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd (Epworth or Employer).

  1. On 28 March 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Catherine Larkins, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the ANMF in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Epworth, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. In the application, the ANMF sought that the ballot close within seven days of the Order on the basis that this is not inappropriate or impracticable for the electronic vote to be carried out expeditiously.

  1. In exercising the discretion in s. 443(3A), the Commission may have regard to requirements beyond those associated with how quickly the ballot can be conducted.[1] I have had regard to these matters and the position  of the ANMF and determined that for the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the date by which voting is to close is 10 April 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR785683.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] CEPU v Nilsen (NSW) Pty Ltd[2023] FWCFB 134, [66].

[2] This is, in effect, 8 working days from the making of the Order.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR785685>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 895
Case
[2025] FWC 895
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking a protected action ballot order for certain employees of Epworth Medical Imaging Pty Ltd. Epworth did not object to the application, resulting in the matter being determined on the papers without a hearing. The ANMF sought to conduct a ballot to facilitate potential protected action by its members.

The key legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the ANMF had met the requirements of section 437 of the Act for a protected action ballot order. This involved establishing that the notification time for the proposed agreement had elapsed and that all conditions in section 443(1) of the Act had been satisfied. The Commission also needed to determine the appropriate closing date for the ballot, taking into account the expeditious nature of the electronic voting process and any other relevant considerations.

The Deputy President, Hampton, found that the ANMF had met all the requirements for a protected action ballot order. The Commission was satisfied that the notification time had passed and that the ANMF had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Epworth. The Deputy President determined that the ballot should close on 10 April 2025, which would allow for the electronic vote to be conducted expeditiously. The matter will be assigned to another Commission member to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference, with an order to compel the attendance of all bargaining representatives and likely directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

This decision confirms the eligibility of Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act and establishes the ballot period for the compulsory conciliation conference. The Commission's decision ensures that the ballot process proceeds in accordance with the statutory requirements, allowing the ANMF to facilitate potential protected action by its members.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.