Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Darebin City Council

Case [2023] FWC 928


[2023] FWC 928

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation
v

Darebin City Council

(B2023/359)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 20 APRIL 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Darebin City Council

  1. This is an application by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Darebin City Council (Respondent).

  1. On 20 April 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Lisa Fitzpatrick of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR761224.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR761223>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Darebin City Council [2023] FWC 928
Case
[2023] FWC 928
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, acting on behalf of its members employed by Darebin City Council, lodged an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 seeking authorisation for a protected action ballot. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission, specifically to Deputy President Clancy, in relation to certain employees of Darebin City Council. The application was not contested by the Respondent, and the matter was determined on the basis of the provided documentation without the need for a hearing.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the conditions for a protected action ballot were satisfied. This required an assessment of whether the notification period for the proposed agreement had elapsed, and if the bargaining process had been conducted in good faith. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the proposed ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS, was a suitable and capable entity to conduct the ballot, ensuring the confidentiality and security of the voting process.

Deputy President Clancy found that the requirements for a protected action ballot were met. The Applicant had demonstrated that it had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Darebin City Council, and that the notification period for the proposed agreement had passed as per section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009. Furthermore, the court was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper entity to act as the ballot agent, given the relevant experience of Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVS, in conducting protected action ballots. CiVS had also agreed to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 regarding the handling of ballot information.

In light of the findings, Deputy President Clancy issued an order appointing CiVS as the protected action ballot agent. This decision was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009, ensuring that the employees of Darebin City Council could proceed with their proposed industrial action under the appropriate legal framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.