Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Queensland Branch

Case [2022] FWC 128


[2022] FWC 128

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Queensland Branch

(RE2021/1220)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Elesha Louise Dawson – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Ms Elesha Louise Dawson. The Commission subsequently issued Ms Dawson a right of entry permit which will expire on 13 December 2024.

  1. Ms Dawson’s permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Ms Dawson to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Ms Dawson, I need to be satisfied that she is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application the ANMF filed declarations by Ms Dawson and Ms Elizabeth Ruth Mohle, Branch Secretary (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Ms Dawson has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 12 October 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1] 

·   Ms Dawson has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Ms Dawson has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Ms Dawson nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by her (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Ms Dawson has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Ms Dawson has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Ms Dawson held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Ms Dawson has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Ms Dawson is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Ms Dawson is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Ms Dawson by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Ms Dawson is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Ms Dawson separately.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 28 October 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 12 October 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737716>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Queensland Branch [2022] FWC 128
Case
[2022] FWC 128
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) sought a right of entry permit for its official, Ms Elesha Louise Dawson, under the Fair Work Act 2009. This application was heard by Deputy President Gostencnik in the Fair Work Commission. The ANMF filed declarations by Ms Dawson and Ms Elizabeth Ruth Mohle, Branch Secretary, to support the application. The permit issued to Ms Dawson was one of the 37 missing permits identified in the decision [2022] FWC 123. For Ms Dawson to hold a valid permit, the missing permit must be revoked, and a new permit must be issued.

The legal issues in this case involved whether Ms Dawson qualified to hold a right of entry permit and whether the previously issued permit should be revoked and a new permit issued. To qualify for a permit, Ms Dawson needed to meet certain criteria, including having received appropriate training, not having been convicted of certain offences, and not having had any entry permit revoked, suspended, or subject to conditions. The court needed to determine if Ms Dawson met these criteria and if her previous permit should be revoked.

The court reviewed the declarations provided by the ANMF and accepted that the information concerning Ms Dawson's qualifications was accurate. The declarations confirmed that Ms Dawson had received the necessary training, had no convictions relevant to the permit, and had not had any permit revoked or conditions imposed on it. The court concluded that Ms Dawson was a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit. Consequently, the court revoked the previously issued permit and ordered that a new permit be issued to Ms Dawson.

In summary, the Fair Work Commission determined that Ms Dawson qualified for a right of entry permit and ordered the revocation of her previously issued permit. A new permit will be issued to Ms Dawson, effective from the date of the decision. The revocation order and the issuance of a new permit are separate orders issued in PR737825 and will be processed accordingly.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.