| [2025] FWC 1411 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
ZNX Pty Ltd
(B2025/809)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 23 MAY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of ZNX Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of ZNX Pty Ltd (ZNX or Employer).
On 22 May 2025, the Commission was advised that the parties had reached a consent position in relation to the application following the removal of one of the proposed ballot questions and the correction of the employer entity name.
In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application to reflect the consent position and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jonathan Smallbone, ASU Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with ZNX, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 7 July 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR787555.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the minimum period required by the AEC.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR787556>
- AGLC
- Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v ZNX Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1411
- Case
- [2025] FWC 1411
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the conditions for a protected action ballot, as outlined in section 443 of the Act, were satisfied. This included verifying that the ASU had genuinely been attempting to reach an agreement and ensuring that all procedural requirements were met. The Deputy President examined the declaration provided by Jonathan Smallbone, an ASU Organiser, which detailed the steps taken in the bargaining process and the union's efforts to reach an agreement with ZNX.
The Deputy President concluded that the ASU had genuinely been attempting to reach an agreement and that all procedural requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. Consequently, the application for a protected action ballot order was granted. The voting period was set to close on 7 July 2025, ensuring it met the minimum requirement set by the Australian Electoral Commission. The matter will proceed with a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another member of the Commission, aiming to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.