Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v West Wimmera Shire Council

Case [2025] FWC 894


[2025] FWC 894

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v

West Wimmera Shire Council

(B2025/520)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 31 MARCH 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of West Wimmera Shire Council

  1. This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of West Wimmera Shire Council (West Wimmera Council or Employer).

  1. On 28 March 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the order being issued. However, West Wimmera Council did raise an issue regarding the nature of one of the proposed ballot questions (question 2 in clause 5) and safety concerns more generally regarding questions 2 and 20.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to conduct a hearing to determine the matter. The hearing was conducted today. It is now common ground that the ballot questions all represent action that is capable of being industrial action within the meaning of the Act.

  1. West Wimmera Council withdrew their other objection on question 2 of the proposed questions, but maintained their safety objection in relation to item 20. West Wimmera Council has acknowledged that these concerns would not prevent the Commission making the ballot order as proposed, but has sought to reserve its right to raise any safety related objections at a later stage.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Raymond William King, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with West Wimmera Council, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 14 April 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR785679.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

S Shepherd of the ASU with B King, B West and T Mulraney.

J Watt on behalf of West Wimmera Shire Council.

Hearing details:

2025
31 March
MS Teams Video.


[1] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR785680>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v West Wimmera Shire Council [2025] FWC 894
Case
[2025] FWC 894
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) sought a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 in relation to certain employees of West Wimmera Shire Council (West Wimmera Council). The application was made to the Fair Work Commission, and West Wimmera Council did not object to the order being issued. However, they raised concerns about the nature of one of the proposed ballot questions and safety concerns more broadly regarding two questions. The Deputy President Hampton conducted a hearing to determine the matter.

The court had to decide whether the proposed ballot questions represented industrial action and if they complied with the Fair Work Act. West Wimmera Council withdrew their objection to one of the questions but maintained their safety objection in relation to another question. The ASU argued that the ballot questions represented industrial action and that they had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with West Wimmera Council. The Deputy President Hampton concluded that the ballot questions all represented action that could be considered industrial action under the Act.

The Deputy President Hampton concluded that the ballot questions all represented action that could be considered industrial action under the Act. The ASU had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with West Wimmera Council, and the requirements of section 443 of the Act had been met. The Deputy President Hampton ordered that the ballot be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, an approved agent, and set the closing date for voting as 14 April 2025. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference.

The Fair Work Commission issued an Order for a protected action ballot to be held in relation to certain employees of West Wimmera Shire Council. The ballot period would close on 14 April 2025, and the ballot would be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference. The Commission also issued an Order in PR785679, and further Directions were likely to ensure that the parties attended the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.