Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1824


[2024] FWC 1824

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v

Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

(B2024/873)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 11 JULY 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd (TN or Employer).

  1. On 11 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Karen Tantari, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 22 August 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied, based on the material provided by TN, that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 7 working days applies to the items listed within clause 6 of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR776926.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR776925>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1824
Case
[2024] FWC 1824
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission, presided over by Deputy President Wright, dealt with an application from the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) for a protected action ballot order against Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd (TN). The ASU sought to conduct a ballot among certain employees of TN for potential protected industrial action. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. TN did not object to the application, prompting the Commission to proceed with the matter on the papers without a hearing.

The primary legal issue for the Commission was whether the ASU had fulfilled the necessary requirements under sections 443 and 443(1) of the Fair Work Act to conduct the ballot. The Deputy President had to determine if the notification time was appropriate and if the ASU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with TN. Additionally, the Deputy President considered whether exceptional circumstances warranted an extended period of written notice for the proposed industrial action as stipulated under section 443(5) of the Act.

Upon reviewing the evidence, including a declaration from the ASU Organiser, Karen Tantari, the Deputy President was satisfied that the ASU had met all requirements for a protected action ballot. The Commission determined that the voting period would close on 22 August 2024, and an extended notice period of seven working days was justified for specific items in the proposed agreement. The Deputy President also noted that the matter would be assigned to another Commission member for a compulsory conciliation conference to ensure meaningful negotiations between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.