| [2023] FWC 2849 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Sydney Water Corporation T/A Sydney Water
(B2023/1177)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | SYDNEY, 30 OCTOBER 2023 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2023/977
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot (PR766198) held in matter B2023/977 and declared on 29 September 2023.
The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application made by the ASU contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
The Respondent has not advised the Commission of any objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible ASU members employed by Sydney Water Corporation T/A Sydney Water be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 30 October 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR767751>
- AGLC
- Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Sydney Water Corporation T/A Sydney Water [2023] FWC 2849
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2849
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the requirements of section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied, specifically whether the application was made by an applicant for the protected action ballot order and whether the period had not been previously extended. The Deputy President Hampton found that the ASU had met the requirements of the Act, and accordingly, granted the application. The decision hinged on the interpretation of the statutory provisions and the fact that the respondent had not raised any objections.
The Deputy President Hampton concluded that the application should be granted as all statutory requirements were met. The 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action was extended by a further 30 days, effective from 30 October 2023. This decision was based on the explicit provisions of the Fair Work Act and the absence of any objections from the respondent. The extension allows the ASU to continue negotiations and potentially resolve the industrial dispute without the immediate threat of industrial action.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.