Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Country Fire Authority

Case [2025] FWC 1203


[2025] FWC 1203

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v

Country Fire Authority

(B2025/686)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 1 MAY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Country Fire Authority

  1. This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Country Fire Authority (CFA or Employer).

  1. On 30 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Matthew Price, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the CFA, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 22 May 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR786877.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 9 calendar days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR786878>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Country Fire Authority [2025] FWC 1203
Case
[2025] FWC 1203
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of the Country Fire Authority (CFA). The ASU sought to conduct a ballot as part of their negotiations for an enterprise agreement with the CFA. The CFA did not object to the application, leading the FWC to decide the matter on the submitted documentation without a formal hearing.

The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the ASU had fulfilled the prerequisites for a protected action ballot under section 443 of the Act. These requirements include the notification period for the proposed agreement and evidence that the ASU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the CFA. The FWC considered the declaration of Matthew Price, an organiser for the ASU, which detailed the union's bargaining efforts and their commitment to reaching an agreement. The FWC was satisfied that the ASU had met all the necessary conditions for the ballot.

The FWC concluded that the ASU had demonstrated a genuine attempt to negotiate with the CFA and that all statutory requirements were met. Consequently, the FWC granted the ASU's application and authorised Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd to conduct the ballot. The voting period for the ballot was set to close on 22 May 2025, establishing the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter was assigned to another FWC member to oversee a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, with directives to ensure the parties engage in meaningful negotiations.

This decision paves the way for the ballot to proceed, ensuring that the ASU can move forward with their proposed protected action, pending the outcomes of the compulsory conciliation conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.