| [2024] FWC 1465 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Maritime Officers' Union
v
Fremantle Ports Authority
(B2024/721)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 5 JUNE 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Fremantle Ports Authority
This is an application by The Australian Maritime Officers’ Union (AMOU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Fremantle Ports Authority (Fremantle Ports or Employer).
I note that Mr Kevin Russell Sneddon has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]
On 5 June 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Glenn Walsh, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMOU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Fremantle Ports, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 24 June 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR775682.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/720.
[2] This is in effect, 7 working days from the anticipated commencement date of the ballot, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR775683>
- AGLC
- Australian Maritime Officers' Union v Fremantle Ports Authority [2024] FWC 1465
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1465
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Deputy President involved determining whether the AMOU had fulfilled the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act 2009. This included verifying that the AMOU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Fremantle Ports, and ensuring that all procedural requirements, such as the timing and conduct of the ballot, were in compliance with the Act. The Deputy President also needed to decide on the closing date for the ballot voting and establish the ballot period for the purpose of the compulsory conciliation conference.
After considering the declaration of Glenn Walsh, Industrial Officer, and the fact that Fremantle Ports did not object to the application, the Deputy President concluded that the AMOU had met all necessary conditions for the protected action ballot. The Deputy President issued an Order for the ballot to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved ballot agent. The closing date for the ballot voting was set as 24 June 2024, which aligns with the statutory requirement of 7 working days from the anticipated commencement date of the ballot. Additionally, the matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference, to be assigned to another Member of the Commission, who will also issue an Order for the conference and likely issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.