| [2024] FWC 17 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Maritime Officers' Union, The
v
Serco Defence Services Pty Limited T/A Serco
(B2024/1)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT | SYDNEY, 3 JANUARY 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Serco Defence Services Pty Limited Trading As Serco
This is an application by The Australian Maritime Officers' Union (AMOU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Serco Defence Services Pty Limited T/A Serco (Serco or Employer).
I observe that there is a related application by The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (AIMPE) in B2023/1411. Both applications relate to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 3 January 2024, the Commission was advised that Serco did not, in effect, object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Jarrod Moran, Senior Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMOU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Serco, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is Friday 19 January 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR769937.
I have amended the order of paragraphs six (6) to eight (8) of the Applicant's proposed order to reflect the Commission's standard drafting style.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference in conjunction with the related matter. To the extent that this involves additional bargaining representatives, that Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400
[2] This is, in effect, 12 working days from the date of the Order.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR769936>
- AGLC
- Australian Maritime Officers' Union, The v Serco Defence Services Pty Limited T/A Serco [2024] FWC 17
- Case
- [2024] FWC 17
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the notification period for the proposed agreement had been met and if all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. The AMOU had to demonstrate that it had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Serco. Additionally, the suitability of Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS) as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act was examined. The court also needed to determine the closing date for voting, which would establish the ballot period.
The Deputy President found that AMOU had met all the requirements for a protected action ballot. The notification time for the proposed agreement had been satisfied, and AMOU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Serco. The suitability of CiVS as a ballot agent was confirmed, and the Commission set the closing date for voting as 19 January 2024, which is 12 working days from the date of the order. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference in conjunction with a related matter. Additional bargaining representatives will be required to attend, and directions may be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations.
The orders issued include the amendment of paragraphs six to eight of the Applicant's proposed order to align with the Commission's standard drafting style. Another order was issued separately to assign the matter to another Member of the Commission for the compulsory conciliation conference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.