Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers' Union v Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2006] FCA 11
•23 JANUARY 2006
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers' Union v Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 11
[2006] FCA 11
23 JANUARY 2006
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Fair Work Commission, the Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers' Union brought a case against Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd, alleging breaches of employment conditions outlined in the Building Services (Victoria) Award 1994 and the Building Services (Victoria) Award 2003. The union further claimed that the respondent failed to pay various employees their due wages and entitlements. The case was heard and determined by the Fair Work Commission.
The primary legal issues the Commission needed to decide were whether the respondent had breached the specified award provisions and, if so, the appropriate penalties for such breaches. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the respondent owed the listed employees specific amounts in unpaid wages and entitlements, and if so, what interest should be applied to these amounts.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the respondent had indeed breached clause 8A(a)(ii) of the Building Services (Victoria) Award 1994 and clause 15.3.1(b) of the Building Services (Victoria) Award 2003. The Commission imposed penalties for these breaches and ordered the respondent to pay each of the listed employees the amounts due, plus interest. The interest rates and periods were calculated based on the dates from which the payments were due to the date of the order.
The Fair Work Commission issued several orders, including the imposition of penalties on the respondent for the award breaches, the payment of specific amounts to each of the listed employees for unpaid wages and entitlements, and the addition of interest to these amounts. The total penalties and payments, including interest, were detailed in the order, ensuring clarity and precision in the financial obligations of the respondent.
The primary legal issues the Commission needed to decide were whether the respondent had breached the specified award provisions and, if so, the appropriate penalties for such breaches. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the respondent owed the listed employees specific amounts in unpaid wages and entitlements, and if so, what interest should be applied to these amounts.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the respondent had indeed breached clause 8A(a)(ii) of the Building Services (Victoria) Award 1994 and clause 15.3.1(b) of the Building Services (Victoria) Award 2003. The Commission imposed penalties for these breaches and ordered the respondent to pay each of the listed employees the amounts due, plus interest. The interest rates and periods were calculated based on the dates from which the payments were due to the date of the order.
The Fair Work Commission issued several orders, including the imposition of penalties on the respondent for the award breaches, the payment of specific amounts to each of the listed employees for unpaid wages and entitlements, and the addition of interest to these amounts. The total penalties and payments, including interest, were detailed in the order, ensuring clarity and precision in the financial obligations of the respondent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Penalties
-
Breach of Contract
-
Restitution
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Interest
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Australian Maritime Officers' Union, The v DP World Melbourne Limited [2025] FWC 2264
Cases Citing This Decision
72
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Airservices (UFU v ASA)
[2016] FCCA 2450
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0