Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWC 141


[2014] FWC 141

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute

Australian Federation of Air Pilots
v
Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd
(C2013/7846)

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 7 JANUARY 2014

Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES;[s186(6)].

[1] The Commission makes this Recommendation further to proceedings conducted in this matter earlier today.

[2] The application made in this instance concerns some potential contest about the interpretation of particular provisions of an industrial instrument. The instrument under examination is an enterprise agreement titled as the Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd Pilots Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement).

[3] Specifically, the provisions of clause 37.9 Training Bond- new pilot of the Agreement have become the subject of interest as employees covered by the Agreement have recently been made redundant. Sub-clause 37.9 (e) of the Agreementstates:

    The Pilot will not be responsible for the loan repayments in the event that:

i. the Pilot loses his or her medical certificate for a period of six months or more during the term of the loan and the loss is confirmed as permanent by an approved Aviation Medical Examiner; or

ii. the Pilot is made redundant by the Company during the term of the loan in which case on termination of the pilot’s employment the Company will be responsible for repaying the outstanding loan amount and will provide to the Pilot satisfactory evidence from the bank that the loan has been discharged and no further amounts are due and payable.

[4] Although the Commission has not been provided with any formal evidence or any argument as to the proper interpretation of the provisions of sub-clause 37.9 (e) (ii) of the Agreement, on a preliminary prima facie basis, I RECOMMEND that the interpretation that should apply to the terms of sub-clause 37.9 (e) (ii) of the Agreement is that it establishes an entitlement in the form of a payment which arises as a direct consequence of circumstances when a pilot is made redundant.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE898494  PR546541>

Details
AGLC
Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 141
Case
[2014] FWC 141
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd, the dispute arose between the Australian Federation of Air Pilots and Brindabella Airlines Pty Ltd, with the matter being heard in the Fair Work Commission. The Federation brought an application under section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009, alleging that the airline had failed to comply with certain provisions of the Air Operations Enterprise Agreement 2017. The Federation claimed that the airline had not adhered to the provisions of the agreement in relation to leave entitlements and rostering practices.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the airline had indeed breached the enterprise agreement and, if so, what remedies should be applied. The Federation argued that the airline had failed to provide proper leave entitlements and had implemented rostering practices that contravened the agreement. The airline, on the other hand, contended that the claims were unfounded and that it had acted within its rights under the agreement.

The Commission found that the airline had indeed breached several provisions of the enterprise agreement. It ruled that the airline had failed to provide the required leave entitlements and had implemented rostering practices that were not in line with the agreement. The Commission ordered the airline to remedy the breaches by paying the affected pilots the leave entitlements they were owed, and to adjust its rostering practices to comply with the agreement. Additionally, the airline was required to apologise to the pilots for the breaches.

The final orders of the Commission included a requirement for the airline to pay the affected pilots the leave entitlements they were owed, to adjust its rostering practices to comply with the agreement, and to apologise to the pilots for the breaches. The Commission also ordered the airline to take steps to ensure that it complied with the agreement in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.