| [2016] FWCA 9215 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission
(AG2016/6996)
AUSTRALIAN CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-19
Australian Capital Territory | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 23 DECEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Community and Public Sector Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 December 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 December 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE422811 PR588934>
- AGLC
- Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission [2016] FWCA 9215
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 9215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The commission considered whether the proposed agreement contained terms that were in breach of the Fair Work Act 2009, or if it unfairly disadvantaged employees. The primary concerns raised by the CPSU related to provisions concerning pay rates, redundancy entitlements, and the definition of "hours worked". The commission needed to determine if these provisions complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and whether they met the "better off overall test".
The commission found that, while some provisions did not meet the better off overall test, the overall package of terms and conditions provided by the agreement was fair and reasonable. The commission approved the agreement, stating that the benefits of the agreement, such as improved pay and conditions, outweighed the minor shortcomings. The commission also noted that the ACIC had demonstrated a commitment to fair and constructive negotiations, which was a significant factor in its decision.
In its decision, the commission approved the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019, subject to certain minor modifications to address the concerns raised by the CPSU. These modifications included clarifying the definition of "hours worked" and making adjustments to the redundancy provisions to ensure they met the better off overall test. The approved agreement will now serve as the basis for employment conditions between the ACIC and its employees for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.