| [2017] FWCA 4339 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Australian Communication Exchange Limited
(AG2017/2263)
AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATION EXCHANGE LIMITED – ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Telecommunications services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | CANBERRA, 21 AUGUST 2017 |
Application for approval of the Australian Communication Exchange Limited – Enterprise Agreement 2016 – Agreement approved with undertakings.
[1] As stated in my decision issued on 11 August 2017 ([2017] FWC 4197) an application was received by the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) on 16 June 2017 for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Communication Exchange Limited – Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made by Australian Communication Exchange Limited (the Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] In the Decision I requested that undertakings be provided by the Applicant in respect of several issues and indicated that subject to the provision of acceptable undertakings in respect of those issues that the Agreement would be approved.
[3] On 21 August 2017 the Applicant provided acceptable undertakings which address my concerns. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A.
[4] I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[5] Pursuant to s.190(4) of the Act the Applicant provided a copy of the attached undertakings to The Australian Municipal and Clerical Services Union, Queensland Together Branch (the ASU). The ASU did not express any concerns regarding the undertakings in its response to the Applicant.
[6] Against that background, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[7] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted the attached undertakings from the Applicant. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[8] The ASU has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 August 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 August 2020.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE425214, PR595487>
- AGLC
- Australian Communication Exchange Limited [2017] FWCA 4339
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 4339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the FWC were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it complied with the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The FWC also had to consider whether the agreement included any provisions that were contrary to public policy or otherwise unenforceable. In assessing these issues, the FWC took into account submissions from both parties, as well as relevant legislation and case law.
The FWC found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by it. The FWC noted that the agreement contained provisions for minimum rates of pay, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions that were consistent with industry standards. However, the FWC also found that certain provisions of the agreement were contrary to public policy and unenforceable. As a result, the FWC approved the agreement with undertakings from the employer to remove these unenforceable provisions.
The FWC's final order was that the Australian Communication Exchange Limited – Enterprise Agreement 2016 be approved with the condition that the employer remove the unenforceable provisions within a specified timeframe. The FWC also directed that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission. This decision provides guidance for employers and employees on the types of provisions that may be considered contrary to public policy and unenforceable under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.