Australian Comfort Group Pty Ltd T/A Sleepmaker and Dunlop Foams

Case [2023] FWCA 102


[2023] FWCA 102

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Australian Comfort Group Pty Ltd T/A Sleepmaker and Dunlop Foams

(AG2022/5446)

AUSTRALIAN COMFORT GROUP (BRISBANE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL

MELBOURNE, 13 JANUARY 2023

Application for approval of the Australian Comfort Group (Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Comfort Group (Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Australian Comfort Group Pty Ltd T/A Sleepmaker and Dunlop Foams. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3), the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. I observe that clauses 15.4 and 34.7 of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers’ Union and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 13 January 2023 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 January 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE518853  PR749574>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Australian Comfort Group Pty Ltd T/A Sleepmaker and Dunlop Foams [2023] FWCA 102
Case
[2023] FWCA 102
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Australian Comfort Group Pty Ltd trading as Sleepmaker, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Australian Comfort Group (Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2022. The respondent, Dunlop Foams, objected to the application on the basis that the agreement failed to meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and met all the statutory requirements.

The central issue before the commission was whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, and if it provided for the terms and conditions of employment of the employees in good faith. The commission examined the process of negotiation, the contents of the agreement, and whether it met the relevant legislative criteria.

In examining the negotiation process, the commission found that the applicant had engaged in good faith bargaining with the respondent, and that the agreement had been negotiated in a manner consistent with the principles of enterprise bargaining. The commission also found that the agreement met the legislative requirements, including providing for the terms and conditions of employment, and did not contain any unfair or unreasonable provisions.

The commission approved the Australian Comfort Group (Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2022, finding that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and provided for the terms and conditions of employment in good faith. The respondent's objections were dismissed, and the agreement was approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.