| [2023] FWC 1450 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union
v
Oakey Beef Exports Pty Ltd
(B2023/599)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 20 JUNE 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Oakey Beef Exports Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Respondent, Oakey Beef Exports Pty Ltd (Oakey).
On 20 June 2023, the Commission was advised that the Respondent did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Matthew Journeaux, AMIEU Official, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) and s.448A(2) of the Act, a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the Order (20 June 2023) has been established by this Commission.[1]
An order has been separately issued in PR763342.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A conference and this Member will issue the Order requiring attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] 1This is the minimum period required by the Australian Electoral Commission.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR763343>
- AGLC
- Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Oakey Beef Exports Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1450
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1450
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met for the application of a protected action ballot order. This involved assessing the steps taken by the AMIEU in bargaining with Oakey, and whether the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer. The court was also required to determine whether the notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been met, and whether the ballot period was appropriate.
The Deputy President Hampton found that the AMIEU had taken the necessary steps to bargain with Oakey and had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement. The court was satisfied that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met, including the notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The Deputy President also established a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the order (20 June 2023) in accordance with sections 443(3)(c) and 448A(2) of the Act. The Australian Electoral Commission was appointed to conduct the ballot. A separate order was issued in PR763342, and the matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for the s.448A conference. Directions may also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
The Fair Work Commission granted the application for a protected action ballot order, and established a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the order. The Australian Electoral Commission will conduct the ballot, and the matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for the s.448A conference. Directions may be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.