| [2023] FWCA 3109 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Australasian Food Group Pty Ltd
(AG2023/2843)
VAN SALES REPRESENTATIVE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023
| Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Application for approval of the Australasian Food Group Pty Ltd (trading as Peters Ice Cream) - Van Sales Representative Enterprise Agreement 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Van Sales Representative Enterprise Agreement 2003 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Australian Food Group Pty Ltd trading as Peters Ice Cream (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Applicant has provided written undertakings (Annexure A). In accordance with s.190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought in relation to the undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as is relevant to this application for approval has been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE521639 PR766579>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Australasian Food Group Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 3109
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 3109
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the proposed enterprise agreement was fair and reasonable, and whether it met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to consider the views of both the employer and the union, as well as the broader implications for the industry and the workforce.
After thorough consideration of the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for competitive pay rates and adequate leave entitlements, and that it appropriately classified the roles within the sales team. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act, and accordingly, it granted approval of the enterprise agreement.
In granting approval, the Commission made several orders to ensure that the agreement would operate effectively in practice. These orders included provisions for the ongoing monitoring and review of the agreement, as well as mechanisms for resolving any disputes that might arise in the future. Overall, the decision represented a positive outcome for both the employer and the union, and provided a clear framework for the operation of the sales team in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.