| [2020] FWCA 6878 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Aus-Rack Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2020/3592)
AUS-RACK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 17 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Aus-Rack Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aus-Rack Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Aus-Rack Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 December 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 December 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509868 PR725608>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Aus-Rack Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 6878
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6878
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues involved whether the exclusion of managerial employees and the shortened duration of the agreement were consistent with the requirements set forth in the Act. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the exclusion of managerial employees was justified and whether the one-year term was reasonable. The applicant argued that the exclusion was necessary due to the unique nature of managerial roles and that a shorter term allowed for flexibility in a rapidly changing business environment.
The Commission concluded that the exclusion of managerial employees was not justified as it did not align with the purpose of the Act to ensure fair and equitable terms for all employees. Furthermore, the one-year term was deemed unreasonable as it did not provide the necessary stability for the workforce. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide fair and consistent terms for all employees, including those in managerial roles, and that the duration of such agreements is reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.