Aun17 v Minister for Immigration
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 826
•1 April 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
AUN17 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCCA 826
[2019] FCCA 826
1 April 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Aun17, sought judicial review of a decision made by the Minister for Immigration. The application was unsuccessful and was dismissed by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to an order for costs, or whether costs should follow the event in favour of the Minister.
Her Honour Judge Riethmuller applied the general rule that costs follow the event, meaning the unsuccessful party is typically ordered to pay the successful party's costs. In this instance, the applicant's application for judicial review was dismissed, rendering the Minister the successful party. Consequently, the Court ordered that the applicant pay the Minister's costs.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to an order for costs, or whether costs should follow the event in favour of the Minister.
Her Honour Judge Riethmuller applied the general rule that costs follow the event, meaning the unsuccessful party is typically ordered to pay the successful party's costs. In this instance, the applicant's application for judicial review was dismissed, rendering the Minister the successful party. Consequently, the Court ordered that the applicant pay the Minister's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Costs
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
SZKJV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2011] FCA 80