Augustus Downs Pastoral Company Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Case

[1930] HCA 13

5 August 1930


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Augustus Downs Pastoral Company Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1930] HCA 13 [1930] HCA 13 5 August 1930

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties to this matter were Augustus Downs Pastoral Company Limited (the appellant) and the Federal Commissioner of Taxation (the respondent). The dispute concerned the assessment of war-time profits tax for the financial year ended 30 June 1917. The appellant contended that the tax as assessed was excessive due to an incorrect calculation of the company's capital, particularly in relation to the valuation of its live-stock. The case was heard by Rich J. and stated for the opinion of the Full Court of the High Court of Australia.

The primary legal issues before the court were: (1) whether the "selected values" of live-stock, as provided for in section 2 of the War-time Profits Tax Assessment Act 1924-1926, were applicable when ascertaining the capital of a business for the purposes of war-time profits tax; and (2) how the capital employed in the business of the company during the year ended 30 June 1917 should be ascertained for the purposes of assessment under the relevant legislation.

The court held that the "selected" values of live-stock referred to in section 2 of the War-time Profits Tax Assessment Act 1924-1926 applied solely to the determination of profits for an accounting period and were not to be used when calculating the capital of a business. Furthermore, the court determined that for the assessment of war-time profits tax for the year ended 30 June 1917, the capital employed in the business should be ascertained by applying the provisions of section 17 of the War-time Profits Tax Assessment Act 1917-1918. This section provided that capital was to be taken as the amount paid up by the owner in money or kind, together with accumulated trading profits invested in the business, and adjusted by balances brought forward from previous profit and loss accounts. The court found that assets acquired by the company with its own money constituted capital paid up by the owner in money within the meaning of section 17(1).
Details

Areas of Law

  • Tax Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0