Atuk and Atuk (No. 2)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 648
•25 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Atuk and Atuk (No. 2) [2017] FamCA 648
[2017] FamCA 648
25 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Family Court of Australia, constituted by Foster J, considered a dispute between the mother and father concerning financial matters. The specific nature of the dispute leading to this judgment is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the final orders made.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of a financial sum to be paid by the mother to the father. The court was required to decide the quantum of this payment and the timeframe within which it was to be made.
Foster J ordered that the mother pay the sum of $3,600.00 to the father, or as he may direct in writing, within three months from the date of the order. This order is subject to its formal entry into the Court’s records.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of a financial sum to be paid by the mother to the father. The court was required to decide the quantum of this payment and the timeframe within which it was to be made.
Foster J ordered that the mother pay the sum of $3,600.00 to the father, or as he may direct in writing, within three months from the date of the order. This order is subject to its formal entry into the Court’s records.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Atuk and Atuk (No. 2) [2017] FamCA 648
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
Atuk and Atuk
[2017] FamCA 441
Atuk & Atuk
[2016] FamCA 283
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4