| [2019] FWCA 7099 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten Incorporated Association T/A Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten
(AG2019/3812)
ATTWOOD CHILD CARE CENTRE & KINDERGARTEN ASSOCIATION INC
Children's services | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 14 OCTOBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Attwood Child Care Centre & Kindergarten Association Inc. Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Attwood Child Care Centre & Kindergarten Association Inc. Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten Incorporated Association T/A Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 14 October 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505712 PR713325>
- AGLC
- Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten Incorporated Association T/A Attwood Child Care Centre and Kindergarten [2019] FWCA 7099
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 7099
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly those requiring the agreement to be in writing, provide for the variation of terms and conditions, and not disadvantage employees. The association argued that the agreement met all the necessary criteria and would benefit the employees by providing clear terms and conditions. The opposition, represented by the Australian Council of Trade Unions, contended that the agreement did not adequately protect the employees' interests and would lead to worse conditions.
The Commission examined the agreement clause by clause, assessing its compliance with the statutory requirements. It noted that the agreement was in writing and provided for the variation of terms and conditions. However, it found that certain clauses did not adequately protect employees' interests, particularly in relation to penalty rates and shift allowances. The Commission concluded that while the agreement aimed to provide clarity, it ultimately disadvantaged the employees and did not meet the standards set by the Fair Work Act. Accordingly, the application was dismissed.
In its decision, the Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that any agreement approved under the Fair Work Act genuinely benefits the employees and does not result in a detriment to their conditions. The association's application for approval of the agreement was rejected, and the existing Award terms and conditions continued to apply.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.