Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v NYZ
Case
•
[2024] QSC 243
•15 October 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v NYZ [2024] QSC 243
[2024] QSC 243
15 October 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v NYZ, the applicant, the Attorney-General for the State of Queensland, sought an order for the detention of the respondent, NYZ, under the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld). The respondent, who has a history of serious sexual offences against children, does not oppose the application. The court was required to decide whether the respondent poses a significant risk to the community if not detained and whether he requires treatment and control in custody.
The court considered evidence from three consultant psychiatrists, Dr Brown, Dr Timmins, and Dr Phillips, who concluded that the respondent is an untreated sexual offender with significant psychopathic traits and a history of non-compliance with court orders. The psychiatrists noted that the respondent exhibited denial and cognitive distortions regarding his offending, which increases his risk of future sexual reoffending. The evidence demonstrated that the respondent had only partially completed a Medium Intensity Sexual Offending Program and had not engaged in other treatment programs. The court found that the respondent's risk of reoffending remained in the moderate to high range if released under a supervision order.
The court determined that there was little to weigh in the balance against the applicant's primary contention. The respondent's counsel made no submissions opposing the application, and the evidence supported the need for indefinite detention for control, care, or treatment. The court concluded that the respondent is a serious danger to the community in the absence of a Division 3 Order and ordered his detention in custody for an indefinite term under section 13(5)(a) of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003.
ORDERS:
1. Pursuant to s 13(5)(a) of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003, the respondent, NYZ, be detained in custody for an indefinite term for control, care or treatment.
The court considered evidence from three consultant psychiatrists, Dr Brown, Dr Timmins, and Dr Phillips, who concluded that the respondent is an untreated sexual offender with significant psychopathic traits and a history of non-compliance with court orders. The psychiatrists noted that the respondent exhibited denial and cognitive distortions regarding his offending, which increases his risk of future sexual reoffending. The evidence demonstrated that the respondent had only partially completed a Medium Intensity Sexual Offending Program and had not engaged in other treatment programs. The court found that the respondent's risk of reoffending remained in the moderate to high range if released under a supervision order.
The court determined that there was little to weigh in the balance against the applicant's primary contention. The respondent's counsel made no submissions opposing the application, and the evidence supported the need for indefinite detention for control, care, or treatment. The court concluded that the respondent is a serious danger to the community in the absence of a Division 3 Order and ordered his detention in custody for an indefinite term under section 13(5)(a) of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003.
ORDERS:
1. Pursuant to s 13(5)(a) of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003, the respondent, NYZ, be detained in custody for an indefinite term for control, care or treatment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Dangerous Offender
-
Sexual Offences
-
Risk Assessment
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0