Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v. Friend
Case
•
[2009] QSC 135
•2 June 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Friend [2009] QSC 135
[2009] QSC 135
2 June 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved the Attorney-General for the State of Queensland and Friend. The central dispute was whether Friend should continue to be subject to a continuing detention order under the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Monitoring) Act 2005 (Qld). Friend was deemed a dangerous sexual offender and had been subject to a detention order since 2008. The legal issues before the court were whether Friend remained a serious danger to the community and whether he should continue to be subject to the detention order. The court had to consider the effectiveness of the treatment programs provided to Friend and the progress made in addressing his condition.
The court examined the provisions of the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Monitoring) Act 2005, which allow for the detention of dangerous sexual offenders. The legislation requires that offenders be provided with psychiatric and psychological treatment to mitigate their risk. The court assessed the evidence regarding the treatment provided to Friend, including delays in accessing treatment, inadequate session duration, and lack of progress in his condition. Despite these challenges, the court determined that Friend's risk level remained high, justifying the continuation of the detention order. The court found that the treatment provided had not significantly reduced Friend's risk of reoffending, necessitating continued detention for the protection of the community.
In light of the evidence and the statutory framework, the court concluded that Friend continued to pose a serious danger to the community. The court ruled that the detention order should remain in effect, as the treatment provided had not sufficiently mitigated his risk. The court acknowledged the difficulties encountered in delivering effective treatment but emphasised the paramount importance of public safety. Consequently, the court ordered that Friend should continue to be subject to the detention order made on 27 February 2008.
The court examined the provisions of the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Monitoring) Act 2005, which allow for the detention of dangerous sexual offenders. The legislation requires that offenders be provided with psychiatric and psychological treatment to mitigate their risk. The court assessed the evidence regarding the treatment provided to Friend, including delays in accessing treatment, inadequate session duration, and lack of progress in his condition. Despite these challenges, the court determined that Friend's risk level remained high, justifying the continuation of the detention order. The court found that the treatment provided had not significantly reduced Friend's risk of reoffending, necessitating continued detention for the protection of the community.
In light of the evidence and the statutory framework, the court concluded that Friend continued to pose a serious danger to the community. The court ruled that the detention order should remain in effect, as the treatment provided had not sufficiently mitigated his risk. The court acknowledged the difficulties encountered in delivering effective treatment but emphasised the paramount importance of public safety. Consequently, the court ordered that Friend should continue to be subject to the detention order made on 27 February 2008.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Dangerous Sexual Offender
-
Continuing Detention Order
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
McGarry v Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) [No 5] [2013] WASC 41
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Friend
[2010] QSC 408
McGarry v Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) [No 5]
[2013] WASC 41
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Friend
[2011] QCA 357
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Attorney-General v Friend
[2008] QSC 27
Attorney-General v Francis
[2006] QCA 324
Attorney-General v Friend
[2008] QSC 27