Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v. Downs
Case
•
[2005] QSC 16
•10/02/2005
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Downs [2005] QSC 16
[2005] QSC 16
10/02/2005
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case involved an application by the Attorney-General for the State of Queensland seeking a determination that Raymond Phillip Downs was a serious danger to the community in the absence of a supervision order under the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003. Downs was due to be released from prison after serving a sentence for indecent treatment of a child under 12. The court was required to determine whether Downs presented an unacceptable risk of committing a serious sexual offence if released from custody without a supervision order in place. The court considered the reports of psychiatrists, the respondent's criminal history, and other relevant factors.
The court found that Downs was a serious danger to the community, based on the evidence presented. The reports of the psychiatrists identified a high to moderate risk of sexual offending within a period of seven to ten years. Downs' criminal history showed a pattern of sexual offences involving pre-pubescent girls over many years. The court also considered Downs' limited intellectual capacity and lack of benefit from sex offender treatment programs. The court concluded that Downs' continued incarceration would only serve the purpose of protecting the community, as there was no rehabilitative potential in keeping him in prison any longer. The court found that a supervision order with strict conditions would adequately protect the community while also accommodating Downs' right to liberty. Downs was allowed supervised contact with his children under the supervision of the Department of Child Safety.
The final orders of the court were that Downs would be subject to a supervision order with the specified conditions, including restrictions on contact with children under 16 years of age, except for supervised contact with his own children at an office of the Department of Families. The supervision order was to take effect at the end of Downs' period of imprisonment. The court considered that the proposed conditions provided reasonable protection to the community while balancing the interests of Downs and the community.
The court found that Downs was a serious danger to the community, based on the evidence presented. The reports of the psychiatrists identified a high to moderate risk of sexual offending within a period of seven to ten years. Downs' criminal history showed a pattern of sexual offences involving pre-pubescent girls over many years. The court also considered Downs' limited intellectual capacity and lack of benefit from sex offender treatment programs. The court concluded that Downs' continued incarceration would only serve the purpose of protecting the community, as there was no rehabilitative potential in keeping him in prison any longer. The court found that a supervision order with strict conditions would adequately protect the community while also accommodating Downs' right to liberty. Downs was allowed supervised contact with his children under the supervision of the Department of Child Safety.
The final orders of the court were that Downs would be subject to a supervision order with the specified conditions, including restrictions on contact with children under 16 years of age, except for supervised contact with his own children at an office of the Department of Families. The supervision order was to take effect at the end of Downs' period of imprisonment. The court considered that the proposed conditions provided reasonable protection to the community while balancing the interests of Downs and the community.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act
-
Risk Assessment
-
Supervision Order
-
Rehabilitation
-
Community Protection
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia v Allen [2006] WASC 160
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia v Allen
[2006] WASC 160
Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia v Allen
[2006] WASC 160
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0