Attorney General for State of Queensland v Solomon

The Attorney General for the State of Queensland filed an originating application seeking orders to allow for the consideration of a Division 3 order under the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) in relation to the respondent, Solomon. Solomon had been convicted of multiple sexual offences against both an adult and a child. The legal issues before the court were whether there were reasonable grounds for believing that Solomon was a serious danger to the community and whether it was appropriate to make orders for the hearing of an application for a Division 3 order, as well as for Solomon to undergo examination by two independent psychiatrists.

The court examined the evidence presented, including the respondent's criminal history, psychiatric evaluations, and actuarial risk assessments. The Crown argued that Solomon had taken advantage of his relationships with the victims and had committed degrading acts, some of which were recorded for his own sexual gratification. Psychiatric evidence suggested that while Solomon's risk of re-offending was low, any future offences would likely be against adult females and could cause serious psychological harm. The court concluded that the evidence, including the respondent's denial of guilt and refusal to discuss the matter, was sufficient to establish reasonable grounds for believing that Solomon was a serious danger to the community. The court found that making orders for the hearing of an application for a Division 3 order, and for Solomon to undergo examination by two independent psychiatrists, was appropriate.

Accordingly, the court made orders in terms of the draft, which were initialled and placed with the papers.