Attorney General for New South Wales v Cullu by his tutor Dr Katherine Johnson (Final)
Case
•
[2025] NSWSC 855
•01 August 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Attorney General for New South Wales v Cullu by his tutor Dr Katherine Johnson (Final) [2025] NSWSC 855
[2025] NSWSC 855
01 August 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved the Attorney General for New South Wales seeking an extension of the status of a forensic patient, Mr Cullu, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and polysubstance use disorder. The decision was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The primary issue before the court was whether Mr Cullu posed an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others if his status as a forensic patient were to cease. Additionally, the court had to consider whether this risk could be adequately managed by less restrictive means.
The court's task was to weigh the statutory criteria outlined in the Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW). This involved examining the evidence concerning Mr Cullu's history of unprovoked violence, his poor medical compliance, and the severity of his mental health conditions. The court needed to determine if the risk of harm to others, should Mr Cullu's forensic patient status be terminated, was sufficiently high to warrant continued detention. Furthermore, it was necessary to assess if alternative measures could sufficiently mitigate this risk.
In its reasoning, the court thoroughly analysed the evidence presented. It concluded that Mr Cullu did indeed pose an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others if his forensic patient status were to end. The court found that his history of violence and non-compliance with treatment made it unlikely that this risk could be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the Attorney General, extending Mr Cullu's status as a forensic patient. The final orders included an extension of Mr Cullu's detention under the Mental Health Act, ensuring that he continues to receive the necessary treatment and care to mitigate the risk he poses to the community.
The court's task was to weigh the statutory criteria outlined in the Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW). This involved examining the evidence concerning Mr Cullu's history of unprovoked violence, his poor medical compliance, and the severity of his mental health conditions. The court needed to determine if the risk of harm to others, should Mr Cullu's forensic patient status be terminated, was sufficiently high to warrant continued detention. Furthermore, it was necessary to assess if alternative measures could sufficiently mitigate this risk.
In its reasoning, the court thoroughly analysed the evidence presented. It concluded that Mr Cullu did indeed pose an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others if his forensic patient status were to end. The court found that his history of violence and non-compliance with treatment made it unlikely that this risk could be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the Attorney General, extending Mr Cullu's status as a forensic patient. The final orders included an extension of Mr Cullu's detention under the Mental Health Act, ensuring that he continues to receive the necessary treatment and care to mitigate the risk he poses to the community.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Mental Health Law
Legal Concepts
-
Unacceptable Risk
-
Serious Harm
-
Risk Management
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
3
Attorney General for New South Wales v Cullu (Preliminary)
[2025] NSWSC 197
Attorney General of New South Wales v Kereopa (No 2)
[2017] NSWSC 928
Attorney-General of NSW v McGuire (No.2)
[2014] NSWSC 288