[2016] FWCA 439 [Note: a correction has been issued to this document]
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 | |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement | |
| ATCO Structures & Logistics Pty Ltd | |
| (AG2015/7852) | |
| ATCO STRUCTURES AND LOGISTICS PTY LTD CURTIS | |
| ISLANDPROJECT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 | |
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 22 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the ATCO Structures and Logistics Pty Ltd Curtis Island Project
Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
ATCO Structures and Logistics Pty Ltd Curtis Island Project Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the
Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
It has been made by ATCO Structures & Logistics Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single
enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met.
[3] It is also noted as a point of clarification, that while Clause 2 of the Agreement
indicates that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries
Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied
Services Union of Australia and The Australian Workers’ Union were bargaining
representatives for the Agreement, this is incorrect as the three Unions were not actually
bargaining representatives.
[2016] FWCA 439
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from
29 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE417529 PR576342>
- AGLC
- ATCO Structures and Logistics Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 439
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 439
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the application met the requirements set out in sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement was properly negotiated and if the process was fair and appropriate. Additionally, the court needed to verify the accuracy of the statement that three unions were bargaining representatives for the agreement.
Commissioner Gregory found that the application satisfied all the relevant requirements for approval. The court noted that while the agreement stated that three unions were bargaining representatives, this was incorrect as those unions did not actually participate in the negotiation of the agreement. Despite this error, the court approved the agreement, effective from 29 January 2016, until its nominal expiry date of 21 January 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.