Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

Case [2024] FWC 2283


[2024] FWC 2283

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia
v

Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

(B2024/1085)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 26 AUGUST 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

  1. This is an application by the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited (Centennial or Employer).

  1. I note that the Mining and Energy Union (MEU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 26 August 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Belinda Giblin, Lead Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the APESMA in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Centennial, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 9 September 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR778658.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2024/1078.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778659>

Details
AGLC
Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited [2024] FWC 2283
Case
[2024] FWC 2283
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) in Adelaide heard an application by the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA) for a protected action ballot order in relation to employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited (Centennial). The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FWA). The Mining and Energy Union (MEU) had separately applied for a ballot order regarding the same proposed enterprise agreement. The Employer did not object to APESMA's application, leading to the matter being decided on the papers without a hearing.

The legal issues before the FWC involved determining whether APESMA had met the requirements under section 443(1) of the FWA for a protected action ballot order and whether the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was approved under section 468A of the FWA. The FWC examined the declaration of Belinda Giblin, Lead Organiser for APESMA, confirming the union's efforts to reach an agreement with Centennial and the notification time for the proposed agreement.

The FWC found that APESMA had fulfilled all necessary requirements for the ballot order. The Commission determined that the ballot period would close on 9 September 2024, establishing the period for voting. The FWC also confirmed that CiVS was an approved ballot agent under the FWA. Consequently, the FWC issued an order granting the ballot order and setting the closing date for voting. This matter will be assigned to another FWC member to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the FWA.

The FWC separately issued an order in PR778658, and the matter will be assigned to another FWC member to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference along with the related matter. The FWC will also issue directions to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.