Assetmark Group Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 6168

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Assetmark Group Pty Ltd
(AG2013/8638)

ASSETMARK GROUP QUEENSLAND CSG AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013-2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD	SYDNEY, 2 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Assetmark Group Queensland CSG and Associated Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2013-2015.

[1] This decision concerns an application for approval of a Greenfields Agreement pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application relates to the Assetmark Group Queensland CSG and Associated Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2013-2015.

[2] The application was lodged by the Assetmark Group Pty Ltd and is a Greenfields Agreement.

[3] The application for approval was lodged in Sydney on 20 August 2013.

[4] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declarations made on behalf of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and The Australian Workers’ Union which I note will be covered by the Agreement.

[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s. 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and The Australian Workers’ Union are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Greenfields Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Greenfields Agreement.

[6] The Greenfields Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Assetmark Group Pty Ltd, a company seeking approval for an agreement related to the development of coal seam gas (CSG) and associated infrastructure in Queensland. The matter was brought before the relevant court to determine whether the proposed agreement should be approved. The court was tasked with considering whether the proposed agreement aligned with statutory requirements and whether it was in the public interest.

The central legal issue was whether the Assetmark Group Queensland CSG and Associated Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2013-2015 met all the criteria set out in the relevant legislation. The court had to examine the terms of the agreement and assess if they were consistent with the objectives of the legislation, particularly in relation to environmental protection, community interests, and sustainable development. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the agreement did not contravene any statutory provisions and that it was in line with the public interest.

After careful consideration of the evidence and submissions, the court concluded that the proposed agreement did indeed meet all statutory requirements and was in the public interest. The court found that the terms of the agreement were sufficiently comprehensive to address environmental concerns, protect community interests, and promote sustainable development. The court was satisfied that the agreement was well-structured, and the proposed measures were adequate to mitigate any potential negative impacts on the environment and local communities. Based on these findings, the court granted the application for approval of the agreement.

The final orders of the court were that the Assetmark Group Queensland CSG and Associated Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2013-2015 be approved, subject to the conditions set out in the court's judgment. This decision allowed Assetmark Group Pty Ltd to proceed with the development of coal seam gas and associated infrastructure in Queensland, provided they adhered to the terms and conditions of the approved agreement.

Assetmark Group Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established