Assad and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation)
Case
•
[2023] AATA 2995
•15 September 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Assad and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2023] AATA 2995
[2023] AATA 2995
15 September 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Mr Tarik Assad sought review by the Tribunal of the Commissioner of Taxation's objection decision, which disallowed Mr Assad's objections against the cancellation of his Australian Business Number (ABN) and Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. The Commissioner had also issued amended GST assessments for various periods between October 2017 and July 2021. Mr Assad contended that he was a sole trader carrying on an enterprise and that the Commissioner's actions were unwarranted.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether Mr Assad was carrying on an enterprise during the relevant periods, whether he was likely to carry on an enterprise for at least 12 months thereafter, and whether the GST assessments issued by the Commissioner were excessive. The onus was on Mr Assad to prove that he was carrying on an enterprise and that the assessments were incorrect.
The Tribunal found that Mr Assad had not provided sufficient reliable evidence to persuade it that he was carrying on an enterprise during the relevant periods or that he intended to do so in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision to cancel Mr Assad's ABN and GST registrations. Furthermore, the Tribunal concluded that Mr Assad had failed to discharge the onus of proving that the GST assessments were excessive, and therefore, those assessments were also affirmed.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether Mr Assad was carrying on an enterprise during the relevant periods, whether he was likely to carry on an enterprise for at least 12 months thereafter, and whether the GST assessments issued by the Commissioner were excessive. The onus was on Mr Assad to prove that he was carrying on an enterprise and that the assessments were incorrect.
The Tribunal found that Mr Assad had not provided sufficient reliable evidence to persuade it that he was carrying on an enterprise during the relevant periods or that he intended to do so in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision to cancel Mr Assad's ABN and GST registrations. Furthermore, the Tribunal concluded that Mr Assad had failed to discharge the onus of proving that the GST assessments were excessive, and therefore, those assessments were also affirmed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tax Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Standing
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
0
McAndrew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1956] HCA 62
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco
[1990] HCA 3
Toyama Pty Ltd v Landmark Building Developments Pty Ltd
[2006] NSWSC 83