[2013] FWCA 4507 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd
(AG2013/6132)
ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT PTY LTD - AMOU BUNKER-TANKER W.A. GREENFIELDS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Maritime industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 10 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd - AMOU Bunker-Tanker W.A. Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] On 22 April 2013 ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd made an application for approval of the ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd - AMOU Bunker-Tanker W.A. Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise greenfields agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the Australian Maritime Officers’ Union (AMOU) which I note will be covered by the Agreement.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s. 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AMOU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 17 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402264 PR538703>
- AGLC
- ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4507
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4507
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly regarding the procedural fairness in its making and whether it contained the necessary provisions to be considered a valid enterprise agreement. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement had been made in accordance with the prescribed process and if it contained the 'pay and conditions' and 'additional terms' as required by the legislation.
The Commission found that the agreement had been made following a process that satisfied the procedural fairness requirements. The union had provided sufficient information to the employees, and there had been an opportunity for them to discuss and seek clarification on the terms of the agreement. Furthermore, the agreement contained all the necessary 'pay and conditions' and 'additional terms' provisions, making it compliant with the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising it as a valid enterprise agreement under the Act.
The Commission ordered the approval of the AMOU Bunker-Tanker W.A. Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2013, effective from the date of the decision. This approval meant that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement would govern the employment of the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.