Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Ashabul Kahfi Islamic Centre Inc v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1730 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 December 2017 Date of orders: 19 December 2017 Decision date: 19 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ashabul Kahfi Islamic Centre Inc (Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant)
Mr G Garrett, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/82796 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application and rely upon the following plans and documentation in the proceedings:
Drawing Number
Drawing Title
Revision
Prepared By
Dated
A1101
Demolition Plan
A
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
22/06/2015
A1200
Basement Plan
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1201
Ground Floor Plan
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1202
Level 01
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1203
Roof Plan
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1500
Elevations (South and North)
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1501
Elevations (East and West)
E
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
31/08/2017
A1600
Material Schedule
B
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
21/09/2017
A1601
Material Schedule
B
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
21/09/2017
A1700
Sections
F
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
21/09/2017
A1750
Tree Section
A
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
15/08/2017
SW01
Cover Sheet
C
SGC
31/08/2017
SW02
Stormwater Concept Design – Basement Plan
C
SGC
31/08/2017
SW03
Stormwater Concept Design – Ground Floor Plan
C
SGC
31/08/2017
SW04
Stormwater Concept Design – Details Sheet
C
SGC
31/08/2017
SW05
Sediment and Erosion Control – Plan and Details
C
SGC
31/08/2017
Doc No.
Document Name
Revision
Prepared By
Dated
150623-
01L-DDNoise Assessment
02
Acoustic Consulting Engineers
31/08/2017
-
Operational Plan of Management
-
7 November 2017
•
Appendix A Operational Plan of Management – Parking Demand Analysis & Patronage Schedule
-
15 July 2017
•
Disability Access Report
-
Access Solutions
11/5/2016
G16033WP
-R01FGeotechnical Investigation Report
-
Geo-environmental Engineering
23/3/2016
•
Waste Management Plan
-
Ghazi Al Ali Architect
24/6/2016
5184/A
Arboricultural Impact Assessment
-
TreeTalk Arboricultural Consulting
August 2017
The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $9,000.00 payable within 60 days of the date of this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Development application DA 286/2016 lodged on 5 July 2016, as amended, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
……………………….
Commissioner Smithson
Annexure A (C) (411 KB, pdf)
FINAL plans (7.26 MB, pdf)
Amendments
19 December 2017 - Conditions of consent attached as Annexure A.
- AGLC
- Ashabul Kahfi Islamic Centre Inc v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1730
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1730
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues involved whether the Council's refusal of the development application was in accordance with the applicable planning legislation, specifically the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The court also needed to consider whether the refusal was discriminatory or whether it adhered to the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. Additionally, the court examined whether the decision was unreasonable in the sense that it was irrational or not based on proper consideration of relevant factors.
The court found that the Council’s decision to refuse the development application was lawful and not discriminatory. The refusal was based on the Centre’s failure to comply with the local environmental plan and zoning by-laws, which designated the area for commercial use rather than community facilities. The court held that the Council had acted within its statutory powers and followed proper procedures. The appeal was dismissed as the Centre did not demonstrate that the decision was unreasonable or breached any legal principles. The court emphasised that the decision was made in accordance with the relevant legislation and was not influenced by any improper considerations.
The final orders of the court included dismissing the appeal and affirming the Council’s decision to refuse the development application. The Centre was also ordered to pay the Council’s costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.