Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1268 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 11, 24 May, 14, 20 June 2016 Date of orders: 20 June 2016 Decision date: 20 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: Development Application: Community Title Subdivision of 3 Lots, Waste water management, adequacy of essential services; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr N. Eastman (Respondent)
Mr Matt Sonter, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
File Number(s): 150755 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
ACTING COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application DA 470/2015 for the resubdivision of proposed residue lot (Lot 20) into two residential lots (Lots 1 and 2) and a residue lot (Lot 3) under Community Title Subdivision at 6 & 6A Orchard Street, Warriewood is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A”.
….……….
R Hussey
Acting Commissioner
150755.16 - Annexure A (98.2 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1268
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1268
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed whether the Council's decision was in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions and whether the decision was unreasonable. Ascot Project Management contended that the Council failed to consider all relevant matters, misapplied the development control provisions, and acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner. The Council, on the other hand, argued that the decision was lawful and justified based on the evidence and applicable planning laws.
In reaching its decision, the court examined the Council's reasoning and the evidence upon which the decision was based. It was found that the Council had correctly applied the development control provisions and had considered all relevant matters. The court determined that the Council's decision was not unreasonable and was supported by sufficient evidence. Ascot Project Management's application for review was dismissed, and the Council's decision was upheld.
The court ordered that the application for review be dismissed and that each party bear their own costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.