| [2017] FWCA 5911 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
Section 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
ASC Pty Ltd T/A ASC Pty Ltd
(AG2017/5106)
ASC PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017-2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ANDERSON | ADELAIDE, 17 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the ASC Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020
[1] An application (F16) was made on 27 October 2017 by ASC Pty Ltd T/A ASC Pty Ltd (ASC) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ASC Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement. It is proposed to replace the ASC Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015 which has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] The application was accompanied by an Employers Statutory Declaration in Support (F17) by Ms Nicole Kidman of the ASC.
[3] The application was also accompanied by three Statutory Declarations of Employee Organisations (F18): the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (SA Branch) (AMWU); the Australian Workers Union (AWU); and the Communications Electrical Electronic Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union, Electrical Division (CEPU).
[4] Each employee organisation was a bargaining representative for the Agreement. Each supported approval of the Agreement. Each has given notice under section 183 of the FW Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with section 201(2) of the FW Act I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU, the AWU and the CEPU.
[5] On 17 November 2017 I conducted a telephone hearing of the parties to consider the application. I sought the views of the applicant and the bargaining representatives in relation to the Agreement.
[6] The employer has provided an undertaking dated 14 November 2017 that it “will apply the consultation provision terms consistent with s. 205 of the Fair Work Act 2009.” It did so in response to the Commission drawing attention to the fact that clause 38 of the Agreement is not in the form of the model clause nor does it specifically include all of the language provided for in section 205(1A)(b) of the FW Act.
[7] In considering this matter I am satisfied that clause 38 ‘Introduction of Change’ does meet the statutory requirements of section 205(1A) of the FW Act. Although it does not specifically refer to employees being invited to express views (including about family and caring responsibilities) I consider that a reasonable construction of clause 38 imposes this obligation as an inferred condition because its express language imposes an obligation to provide information to employees and then imposes an express obligation to give prompt consideration to views expressed by employees. It does not limit what those views could concern. I have therefore received the undertaking as material advanced by the applicant in support of the application but do not consider it necessary to deal with it any more formally. As an expression on the record of how the employer intends to apply clause 38 it is capable of being used as an aide to interpretation of that clause should a dispute over interpretation or implementation arise in the future.
[8] Consequently, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188, 202 and 205 of the FW Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[9] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54 of the Act and noting the terms of clause 6 of the Agreement it will operate from 24 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 November 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Appearances:
Ms A. Cooper and Mr S. Long, for the Applicant
Mr S. Pisoni of the CEPU
Mr P. Bauer of the AMWU
Mr F. Mateos of the AWU
Hearing details:
2017.
Adelaide.
17 November.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE426053 PR597627>
- AGLC
- ASC Pty Ltd T/A ASC Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5911
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5911
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the Commission was required to address included whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it contained terms that complied with the statutory requirements. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it adequately protected employees' rights and interests. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement was consistent with the broader principles of the Act, including those relating to industrial action, workplace relations, and the protection of vulnerable workers.
The Commission found that the Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020 was genuinely negotiated between the applicant and the relevant employee representatives. It was determined that the agreement contained fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it adequately protected employees' rights and interests. The Commission also found that the agreement was consistent with the broader principles of the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020, subject to certain conditions.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2017-2020, with specific provisions regarding notice periods, redundancy payments, and the resolution of disputes. The applicant was also required to provide written confirmation that it would comply with the terms of the agreement and the conditions of approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.